Description
Pancreatitis is defined as inflammation of the pancreas that progresses from acute (AP) (sudden onset; duration less than six months) to recurrent acute (RAP) (more than one episode of acute pancreatitis) to chronic (CP) (duration greater than six months).¹ This recurrent inflammation can lead to total destruction of the pancreas with subsequent pancreatic insufficiency, secondary diabetes, increased risk for pancreatic cancer, and severe unrelenting pain.² Hereditary pancreatitis is the early onset form of chronic pancreatitis that is carried in an autosomal dominant pattern with variable penetrance.³ 

Policy
Application of coverage criteria is dependent upon an individual’s benefit coverage at the time of the request.

1. For individuals under 20 years of age, genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis (see Note 1) is considered MEDICALLY NECESSARY when at least one of the following conditions is met:
   1. For individuals with recurrent (two separate, documented episodes with hyperlipasemia) attacks of acute pancreatitis for which there is no identifiable cause.
   2. For individuals with unexplained chronic pancreatitis.
   3. For individuals with a first- or second-degree relative (see Note 2) with a history of recurrent acute pancreatitis, idiopathic chronic pancreatitis, or childhood pancreatitis without a known cause.
   4. For individuals with an unexplained episode of pancreatitis that required hospitalization.

The following does not meet coverage criteria due to a lack of available published scientific literature confirming that the test(s) is/are required and beneficial for the diagnosis and treatment of an individual’s illness.

2. For all other situations not described above, genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis is considered NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY.

NOTES:

Note 1: For two or more gene tests being run on the same platform, please refer to CAM 235 Laboratory Guideline Policy .

Note 2: First-degree relatives include parents, full siblings, and children of the individual. Second-degree relatives include grandparents, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, grandchildren, and half-siblings of the individual.

Table of Terminology

Rationale 
Pancreatitis is caused by unregulated trypsin activity within the pancreatic acinar cell or pancreatic duct that leads to pancreatic autodigestion and pancreatic inflammation.^4,5 Under acinar cell stress (e.g., hyperstimulation, intracellular hypercalcemia), intracellular trypsinogen is likely converted to trypsin, which activates other digestive enzymes causing injury. Injury releases immune system-activating molecules that cause an initial acute inflammatory response, followed by recruitment of tissue macrophages and activated pancreatic stellate cells. Recurrent injury leads to chronic pancreatitis and fibrosis, mediated by pancreatic stellate cells.⁶

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a progressive inflammatory disease in which the pancreatic tissue is destroyed over time and replaced by fibrous tissue. The process of fibrosis usually leads to progressive worsening in the structural integrity of the pancreas, changes in arrangement, and composition of the islets, and deformation of the large ducts, eventually resulting in the impairment of both exocrine and endocrine functions.⁷ The incidence of acute pancreatitis ranges from 13 to 45 per 100,000 population-years and that of chronic pancreatitis ranges from 5 to 12 per 100,000 population-years.⁸ The main symptom of CP is pain; however, it is highly variable in character, frequency, and severity.^9,10 Therapeutic efforts are mostly aimed at extracting stones and decompressing pancreatic ducts to achieve ideal drainage of the pancreatic duct.^11,12 Genetic risk factors play a larger role in early-onset CP as opposed to late-onset CP. Older adults have a host of environmental and genetic factors that contribute to CP development while hereditary pancreatitis is postulated to make up less than four percent of CP in late-onset groups.¹³

The etiologies of chronic pancreatitis are classified by the TIGAR-O system into alcoholism, hyperlipidemia, obstructive damage caused by trauma or congenital anomalies, hereditary pancreatitis, autoimmune pancreatitis, and idiopathic.^14,15 The genetic factors listed in TIGAR-O are PRSS1 (listed as “cationic trypsinogen”), CFTR, SPINK1, and alpha-1-antitrypsin (listed as “possible”).¹⁴ TIGAR-O Version 2 was published in 2019, and lists PRSS1, CFTR, SPINK1, CTRC, CASR, and CEL as genetic factors, as well as some modifier genes such as CLDN2.¹⁶

Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) presents as an autosomal dominant chronic pancreatitis with variable penetrance. It mainly develops in childhood.¹³ This variability has been attributed to a genetic predisposition to chronic pancreatitis with the additive effects of environmental and inherited factors. Most genes associated with HP either directly encode components of the trypsin system of the exocrine pancreas or are likely to perturb this system indirectly. HP is recognized when pathogenic gene variants of the PRSS1 gene are found or when acute or chronic pancreatitis develops with a distinct family history.¹³ The phenotype of HP is increased susceptibility to acute pancreatitis, resulting in chronic pancreatitis (including pancreatic fibrosis, chronic pain, maldigestion, and diabetes mellitus) occurring in at least 50%. The risk of pancreatic cancer is also increased.¹⁷

Genes Linked to Hereditary Pancreatitis

PRSS1 encodes trypsin-1 (cationic trypsinogen), a major pancreatic digestive enzyme. Mutations in PRSS1 typically result in a trypsin protein that is either prematurely activated or resistant to degradation,^3,18 causing autosomal dominant pancreatitis in 60%-100% of families with hereditary pancreatitis.¹⁹ “The age of onset for PRSS-1 related HP ranges from 10 to 12 years.”²⁰

SPINK1 encodes serine protease inhibitor, Kazel-type 1, a trypsin inhibitor that is upregulated by inflammation.²¹ It is not a typical susceptibility gene for acute pancreatitis, but rather a susceptibility gene for the chronic pancreatitis that follows acute pancreatitis.

CTRC encodes chymotrypsin C. Prematurely activated trypsin is destroyed by CTRC by acting on the molecule within the calcium-binding loop in the absence of calcium and, therefore, is a crucial candidate gene in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis.²²

CASR encodes calcium sensing receptor, mutations of which can cause increased calcium ion levels increasing trypsin activation and failed trypsin degradation.²³

CFTR encodes the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance protein. Mutations are associated with recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis since dysfunctional CFTR can result in retention of zymogens that can become active and result in pancreatitis.¹⁹

CLDN2 encodes claudin-2, a tight-junction protein that seals the space between epithelial cells. Normally expressed in the proximal pancreatic duct, CLDN2 is thought to facilitate the transport of water and sodium into the duct to match the chloride and bicarbonate that are actively secreted by pancreatic duct cells through CFTR. It is strongly associated with alcohol-related chronic pancreatitis rather than recurrent acute pancreatitis.²

CPA1 encodes carboxypeptidase A1; mutated CPA1 is associated with nonalcoholic chronic pancreatitis, especially with an early age of onset.²⁴ Risk for chronic pancreatitis unrelated to trypsin activation appears to be related to endoplasmic reticulum stress from pathogenic CPA1 variants that alter protein folding, triggering the unfolded protein response.

MYO9B gene and the two tight-junction adaptor genes, PARD3 and MAGI2, have been linked to gastrointestinal permeability. Impairment of the mucosal barrier plays an important role in the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis.²⁵

CEL encodes carboxyl-ester lipase, and CEL mutations can cause an autosomal dominant syndrome of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction.²⁶

TRPV6 is a potential novel susceptibility gene for CP that plays a role in epithelial calcium absorption and reabsorption. Variants of this gene also co-occur with pathogenic variants of genes such as SPINK1 and CFTR.¹³

Several genes are associated with rare disorders in which pancreatitis or pancreatic insufficiency is part of their phenotype.^31,32

As the number of genes and mutations involved in the onset and progression of pancreatitis becomes higher,^33,34 the time and cost of screening and sequencing specific genes continues to increase. However, massive parallel sequencing or next generation sequencing (NGS) is becoming standardized,³⁵ and the cost per patient is rapidly dropping.³⁶ NGS includes whole genome sequencing, whole exome sequencing (WES) and other methods. Because the cost of WES is now less than the cost of sequencing CFTR, use of this technology is becoming an attractive alternative to classic targeted gene sequencing or mutation specific genotyping for a genetic counseling workup.³ In response to this accelerating development of sequencing techniques, several firms have created genetic panels focusing on hereditary pancreatitis. For example, Invitae offers a six-gene panel (CASR, CFTR, CPA1, CTRC, PRSS1, SPINK1) for chronic pancreatitis.³⁷ Other firms offering proprietary panels include ARUP Laboratories (4 genes), LabCorp (3 genes), and Ambry (6 genes).^38-40 Still other firms evaluate as many as 12 genes and more.¹⁷

Clinical Utility and Validity
Testing for mutations in the PRSS1, SPINK, and CFTR genes is usually done by either direct sequence analysis or next generation sequencing, both of which have high analytic validity. Several studies have evaluated the clinical validity of genetic testing.^41-44 One limitation with some studies was lack of inclusion of patients with clinically defined hereditary pancreatitis. Hence, the true clinical sensitivity and specificity of genetic testing in hereditary pancreatitis cannot be accurately determined and needs to be further researched. Similarly, there is a lack of published literature on the clinical utility of testing. Further research is required to evaluate how genetic testing will impact patient management decision and clinical outcomes.

Kumar, et al. (2016) sought to characterize and identify risk factors associated with acute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and CP in childhood in a multinational cross-sectional study (INSPPIRE). The authors analyzed 301 children with ARP or CP. They found that “At least 1 gene mutation in pancreatitis-related genes was found in 48% of patients with ARP vs 73% of patients with CP. Children with PRSS1 or SPINK1 mutations were more likely to present with CP compared with ARP (PRSS1: OR = 4.20 and SPINK1: OR = 2.30). Obstructive risk factors presented in 33% in both groups, but toxic/metabolic risk factors were more common in children with ARP (21% overall; 26% ARP, 15% CP). They concluded that “The high disease burden in pediatric CP underscores the importance of identifying predisposing factors for progression of ARP to CP in children.”⁴⁵

Grabarczyk, et al. (2017) also found that CTRC variants are strong CP risk factors in pediatric patients. The authors investigated 136 pediatric patients with CP and compared them to 401 controls. They showed that p.Arg254Trp (4.6%) and p.Lys247_Arg254del (5.3%) heterozygous mutations are frequent and significantly associated with CP risk in pediatric patients (odds ratio [OR] = 19.1; 95% CI 2.8-160; P = 0.001 and OR = 5.5; 95% CI 1.6-19.4; P = 0.001, respectively). The c.180TT genotype of common p.Gly60Gly variant was found to be a strong and independent CP risk factor (OR = 23; 95% CI 7.7-70; P < 0.001) with effect size comparable to p.Arg254Trp mutation.⁴⁶

Schwarzenberg, et al. (2015) evaluated the genetic spectrum of CP. A total of 76 CP patients were examined, and 51 were found to have a genetic risk factor for CP. Of these 51 mutations, 33 were a PRSS1 mutation, 14 were a SPINK1 mutation, 11 were a CFTR mutation, and 2 were a CTRC mutation. The final 25 patients were found to have an obstructive risk factor.⁴⁷

Zou, et al. (2018) evaluated the prevalence of four CP-related genes (SPINK1, PRSS1, CTRC, CFTR) in Han Chinese patients. The authors performed next-generation sequencing on 1061 patients and 1196 controls. The 1061 patients were further divided into three categories, idiopathic CP (ICP, 715 patients), alcoholic CP (ACP, 206), and smoking-associated CP (SCP, 140). The impact of rare pathogenic variants on age of onset and clinical outcomes was evaluated. Rare pathogenic variants were found in 535 CP patients compared to 71 controls. Mutation positive patients were found to have earlier age of onset as well additional clinical features such as pancreatic stones and diabetes mellitus compared to mutation negative ICP patients. Overall, pathogenic variants were found in 57.1% of ICP patients, compared to 39.8% of ACP patients and 32.1% of SCP patients. The authors concluded that rare pathogenic variants “significantly” influenced age of onset and clinical outcomes of CP.⁴⁸

Nabi, et al. (2020) evaluated 239 children in a prospective study from January 2015 to May 2018 to examine genetic risk factors in children with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis (IARP). Among the enrollees, 85.35% children had IARP, and found that family history of pancreatitis was found among 4.6% of participants. For specific genes, “mutations/polymorphisms in at least 1 gene were identified in 89.5% (129/144) children including SPINK1 in 41.9%, PRSS1 (rs10273639) in 58.2%, CTRC in 25.6%, CTSB in 54.9%, CLDN2 in 72.9%, and CFTR in 2.3%.” This conveys the overlapping genetic nature of IARP with related genes in HP, making genetic testing important for managing potential disease progression.

Suzuki, et al. (2020) investigated the currently understood genetic abnormalities in pancreatitis, and found that “patients with these genetic predispositions [PRSS1 and SPINK1 genes], both children and adults, have often been initially diagnosed with idiopathic acute pancreatitis, in approximately 20-50% pediatric cases and 28-0% of adult cases… Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) due to SPINK1 gene mutation and HP patients have a potentially high risk of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, and of particular importance, pancreatic cancer.” This conveys the continuously emphasized clinical utility of genetic testing to pursue opportunities for counselling and symptom management with disease progression, despite not having gene therapy options for directly targeting HP causing and associated genes.⁵⁰

Weiss, et al. (2020) discussed the potential pitfalls from using next generation sequencing (NGS) to diagnose PRSS1 mutations in chronic pancreatitis. Due to the “high degree of DNA sequence homology (>91%) between PRSS1 and other members of the trypsinogen multigene family,” there may be erroneous diagnoses of pathologic chronic pancreatitis among patients with benign variants of other PRSS1- related genes, like PRSS2 or PRSS3P2. The researchers concluded that sequence homology “can confound the mapping of short NGS reads to a reference genome and lead to technical artefacts.” They recommend “careful clinical evaluation, pretest and post-test genetic counselling and confirmation of NGS test results by Sanger sequencing” to confirm a diagnosis of genetically mutated chronic pancreatitis. This presented the precautions that must be accounted for when utilizing genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis.⁵¹

Zou, et al. (2020) performed whole genome sequencing on a population of 464 Chinese CP patients and on a group of 504 control participants. The Transient receptor potential cation channel, Subfamily V, Member 6 (TRPV6) gene was identified as a gene significantly associated with chronic pancreatitis through a “burden test of aggregated rare nonsynonymous variants with a combined annotation dependent depletion score > 20 (p = .020).” In another phase of the study, Sanger sequencing was used to analyze the entire coding sequence and exon/intron boundaries of the TPRV6 gene. Combining the two phases of the study, the authors identified 25 distinct variants of TPRV6 and noted that loss-of-function variants were over-represented in the chronic pancreatitis group. The authors concluded that TPRV6 is likely a novel susceptibility gene for chronic pancreatitis.

Consensus Committees of the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatic Diseases, the Midwest Multi-Center Pancreatic Study Group and the International Association of Pancreatology
A Consensus Committees of the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatic Diseases, the Midwest Multi-Center Pancreatic Study Group and the International Association of Pancreatology developed guidelines for genetic testing of the PRSS1 gene and genetic counseling for HP.⁵³ The recommended indications for symptomatic patients included:

• Recurrent (two separate, documented episodes with hyperlipasemia) attacks of acute pancreatitis for which there is no explanation (anatomical anomalies, ampullary or main pancreatic strictures, trauma, viral infection, gallstones, alcohol, drugs, hyperlipidaemia, etc.)
• Unexplained chronic pancreatitis
• A family history of pancreatitis in a first- or second-degree relative
• Unexplained episode of pancreatitis in a child that required hospitalization

Predictive (presymptomatic) genetic testing of unaffected relatives is considered more complex. Predictive testing is recommended only for individuals with a first-degree relative with a defined HP gene mutation, and who are over 16 years of age and capable of making an independent and fully informed decision.⁵³

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
The ASCO included the following statements in the Pancreatic Cancer Risk Factors guidelines that chronic pancreatitis is sometimes due to an inherited gene mutation. People with this inherited form of pancreatitis have a higher lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer. One of the examples of a genetic syndrome that can cause pancreatic cancer include hereditary pancreatitis, usually caused by mutations in the PRSS1 gene.⁵⁴

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)
In the ACG Clinical Guideline: Genetic Testing and Management of Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Syndromes, they included that “consideration for genetic counseling for testing for hereditary pancreatitis is based on expert opinion and warranted for PC patients with a personal history of at least 2 attacks of acute pancreatitis of unknown etiology, a family history of pancreatitis, or early-age onset chronic pancreatitis.”⁵⁵

In 2020, the ACG published clinical guidelines on chronic pancreatitis. There, they state that “in patients with clinical features of CP, a comprehensive review of all risk factors should be performed. This provides information on the underlying mechanisms, identifies both fixed and modifiable risk factors, identifies potential targets for therapies, and provides clinically relevant prognostic information.” As part of that initial approach, they recommend genetic testing in patients “with clinical evidence of a pancreatitis-associated disorder or possible CP [chronic pancreatitis] in which the etiology is unclear, especially in younger patients (strong recommendation, low quality of evidence).” The guideline goes on to state that “at minimum, patients with idiopathic CP should be evaluated for PRSS1, SPINK1, CFTR, and CTRC gene mutation analysis…” The guideline mentions that assessment of germline mutations is primarily for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, rather than diagnostic.⁵⁶

In the 2024 American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis, ACG included a section on genetic testing which stated that “while the role of genetic defects contributing to this disorder has become increasingly recognized and may be a contributory cause in patients with anatomic anomalies, it is not clear how this can be used effectively in most patients with idiopathic pancreatitis. Genetic testing may be useful in patients with more than 1 family member with pancreatic disease. Patients with true recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis should be evaluated at centers of excellence focusing on pancreatic disease, providing advanced endoscopy, genetic testing, and a combined multidisciplinary approach.”⁵⁷

United European Gastroenterology (UEG)
The United European Gastroenterology published evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis which recommend:⁵⁸

“All patients with a family history or early onset disease (<20 years) should be offered genetic testing for associated variants.”

“Genetic screening for every CP patient cannot be recommended since alcohol abuse is the predominant cause of the disease in up to 60% of adult cases.”

“In patients with early onset CP, genetic screening can be offered after informed consent.”

“In patients with alcoholic CP, routine genetic testing cannot be recommended.”

The working group also noted that “variants in SPINK1 and CTRC, and to a lesser extent, common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PRSS1 and CLDN2-MORC4 loci, are associated with alcoholic CP.”⁵⁸

European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group (HPSG)
The European Pancreatic Club, in collaboration with the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group, organized a consensus guideline meeting on the diagnosis and management of pancreatitis in the pediatric population which state the following:

“Pediatric AP and RAP often develop in the background of genetic susceptibility and genetic testing is warranted in patients with a second episode of idiopathic AP or first episode of idiopathic AP and a family history of AP or CP. Full sequence analysis of PRSS1, SPINK1, CTRC, CPA1 and CFTR gene exons and exon-intron boundaries and testing for the pathogenic CEL hybrid allele are recommended”. The authors go further to mention that “Variants in the PRSS1 and CPA1 genes may be associated with a family history of pancreatitis or even autosomal dominant hereditary pancreatitis. Children with a single episode of AP are at risk for developing a second episode. However, genetic testing is cumbersome and expensive. There is usually no therapeutic consequence, but it may assist in long term prognosis.”⁵⁹

“The presence of mutations in the above mentioned genes increases the risk of ARP and CP. Hereditary pancreatitis associated with mutations in PRSS1, especially p.R122H, that could considerably increase the risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Knowing the genetic risk factors may not alter the therapy, but it helps to understand the disease's etiological background for the disease and may lead to future targeted investigation.”⁵⁹

Regarding the etiological factors in childhood onset CP, the authors assert that “genetic variations are the most common risk factors for development of pediatric CP. (GRADE 1/A, full agreement) However, other risk factors such as obstruction, autoimmune and toxic and metabolic factors also need to be examined. (GRADE 2/B, full agreement)”. Moreover, as “there is an association between CP and cystic fibrosis (CF), therefore a sweat test should be performed to screen for CF as a possible etiological factor in children. (GRADE 1/A, strong agreement).”⁵⁹

International Study Group of Pediatric Pancreatitis: In search for a cuRE (INSPPIRE) Consortium
This group was formed “to collect detailed information on a cohort of children with ARP and CP with the aim to fill gaps in knowledge and improve clinical care.” Their genetic testing-related guidelines are listed below:

• “The search for a genetic cause of ARP or CP should include a sweat chloride test (even if newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) is negative) and PRSS1 gene mutation testing. Genetic testing for CF should be considered if a sweat test is unable to be performed.”
• “Mutation analysis of the genes SPINK1, CFTR and CTRC may identify risk factors for ARP or CP.”
• “Patients with ARP or CP and a sweat test <=60 mmol/L should have expanded CFTR mutation testing done if there is no other identified cause of their pancreatic disease (such as a PRSS1 mutation or a clear obstructive etiology).”⁶⁰

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)
The NCCN notes familial pancreatitis and non-hereditary forms of pancreatitis are both linked with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Additionally, chronic pancreatitis is another risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The NCCN specifically lists PRSS1, SPINK1, and CFTR as contributing genes to familial pancreatitis. The approximate increase in risk of pancreatic cancer is somewhere between 26-fold and 87-fold in those with the PRSS1, SPINK1, and CFTR gene mutations

The NCCN has guidelines on Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma which include the following recommendations:

“Patients with pancreatic cancer for whom a hereditary cancer syndrome is suspected should be considered for genetic counseling. The Panel emphasizes the importance of taking a thorough family history when seeing a new patient with pancreatic cancer. In particular, a family history of pancreatitis, melanoma, and cancers of the pancreas, colorectum, breast, and ovaries should be noted. The Panel recommends using comprehensive gene panels for hereditary cancer syndromes to test for inherited mutations for any patient with confirmed pancreatic cancer.”⁶¹

The NCCN included guidelines on pancreatitis in the Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate Guidelines. The guidelines state that “hereditary pancreatitis is defined by the presence of a causative P/LP variant such as PRSS1 or SPINK1, or a suspicious family history of chronic pancreatitis (two first-degree relatives or three second-degree relatives across ≥2 generations) without precipitating factors and with a negative workup for other known causes of pancreatitis. Hereditary pancreatitis is associated with increased lifetime risk of exocrine pancreatic cancer. The clinical significance of the P/LP variant such as PRSS1 or SPINK1 is unclear without a clinical history of pancreatitis. Therefore, germline testing for PRSS1, SPINK1, and other genes associated with pancreatitis is generally not recommended unless one’s personal or family history is suggestive of hereditary pancreatitis. Pancreas cancer screening is recommended in individuals harboring one of these variants only in the presence of a clinical phenotype consistent with hereditary pancreatitis. For individuals meeting these criteria, screening may begin at age 40, or 20 years after onset of pancreatitis, whichever is earlier.”⁶²

International Association of Pancreatology, American Pancreatic Association, Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club
In 2020, the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club released a set of international consensus guidelines on surveillance for pancreatic cancer in the setting of chronic pancreatitis. Though the working group did not explicitly endorse or oppose genetic testing, it was clear that due to the recommendations separated by genetic variants within chronic pancreatitis, genetic testing would become critical for surveillance. With regards to the conditions by which hereditary pancreatitis would warrant surveillance for cancer, the working group stated:

• “The risk of pancreatic cancer in affected individuals with an autosomal dominant history of hereditary pancreatitis due to inherited PRSS1 mutations is high enough to justify surveillance. Quality assessment: high; recommendation: strong”
• “The risk of pancreatic cancer in affected individuals with an autosomal dominant history of hereditary pancreatitis but without PRSS1 mutations is high enough to justify surveillance. Quality assessment: moderate; recommendation: weak”
• “The risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis associated with SPINK1 p. N34S is not high enough to justify screening or surveillance. Quality assessment: moderate; recommendation: strong”
• “The risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with chronic pancreatitis associated with other germline mutations including those of CFTR, CTRC, CPA1, and CEL, is not high enough to justify screening or surveillance. Quality assessment: moderate; recommendation: conditional.”⁶³

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
The NICE updated their guidelines on pancreatitis in December 2020. With regards to genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis (acute) and patient information, NICE stated the following:

“Give people with pancreatitis, and their family members or carers (as appropriate), written and verbal information on the following, where relevant, as soon as possible after diagnosis:

• pancreatitis and any proposed investigations and procedures, using diagrams
• hereditary pancreatitis, and pancreatitis in children, including specific information on genetic counselling, genetic testing, risk to other family members, and advice on the impact of their pancreatitis on life insurance and travel
• the long-term effects of pancreatitis, including effects on the person's quality of life
• the harm caused to the pancreas by smoking or alcohol.”

For an individual with chronic pancreatitis, NICE recognizes that the cause may not be alcohol-related, but can include “genetic factors; autoimmune disease, in particular IgG4 disease; metabolic causes; [and] structural or anatomical factors.”⁶⁴

References   

1. LaRusch J, Solomon S, Whitcomb DC. Pancreatitis Overview. GeneReviews. University of Washington, Seattle; 2020. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK190101/
2. Ravi Kanth V, Nageshwar Reddy D. Genetics of acute and chronic pancreatitis: An update. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Nov 15 2014;5(4):427-37. doi:10.4291/wjgp.v5.i4.427
3. LaRusch J, Barmada MM, Solomon S, Whitcomb DC. Whole exome sequencing identifies multiple, complex etiologies in an idiopathic hereditary pancreatitis kindred. JOP : Journal of the pancreas. May 10 2012;13(3):258-62.
4. Whitcomb DC. Early trypsinogen activation in acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. Mar 1999;116(3):770-2.
5. Lerch MM, Gorelick FS. Early trypsinogen activation in acute pancreatitis. The Medical clinics of North America. May 2000;84(3):549-63, viii. doi:10.1016/S0025-7125(05)70239-X
6. Werlin S, Konikoff FM, Halpern Z, et al. Genetic and electrophysiological characteristics of recurrent acute pancreatitis. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. May 2015;60(5):675-9. doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000000623
7. Brock C, Nielsen LM, Lelic D, Drewes AM. Pathophysiology of chronic pancreatitis. World journal of gastroenterology. Nov 14 2013;19(42):7231-40. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7231
8. Ouyang G, Pan G, Liu Q, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatitis in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMC Medicine. 2020/12/10 2020;18(1):388. doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01859-5
9. Mullady DK, Yadav D, Amann ST, et al. Type of pain, pain-associated complications, quality of life, disability and resource utilisation in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective cohort study. Gut. Jan 2011;60(1):77-84. doi:10.1136/gut.2010.213835
10. Whitcomb DC, Yadav D, Adam S, et al. Multicenter approach to recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis in the United States: the North American Pancreatitis Study 2 (NAPS2). Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) [et al]. 2008;8(4-5):520-31. doi:10.1159/000152001
11. Tandan M, Nageshwar Reddy D. Endotherapy in chronic pancreatitis. World journal of gastroenterology. Oct 7 2013;19(37):6156-64. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6156
12. Li ZS, Wang W, Liao Z, et al. A long-term follow-up study on endoscopic management of children and adolescents with chronic pancreatitis. The American journal of gastroenterology. Aug 2010;105(8):1884-92. doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.85
13. Wertheim-Tysarowska K, Oracz G, Rygiel AM. Genetic Risk Factors in Early-Onset Nonalcoholic Chronic Pancreatitis: An Update. Genes (Basel). 2021;12(5):785. doi:10.3390/genes12050785
14. Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments. Gastroenterology. Feb 2001;120(3):682-707. doi:10.1053/gast.2001.22586
15. Sun C, Liu MY, Liu XG, et al. Serine Protease Inhibitor Kazal Type 1 (SPINK1) c.194+2T > C Mutation May Predict Long-term Outcome of Endoscopic Treatments in Idiopathic Chronic Pancreatitis. Medicine. Nov 2015;94(47):e2046. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000002046
16. Whitcomb DC. Pancreatitis: TIGAR-O Version 2 Risk/Etiology Checklist With Topic Reviews, Updates, and Use Primers. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. Jun 2019;10(6):e00027. doi:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000027
17. Schwarzenberg SJ. Pancreatitis associated with genetic risk factors. Updated September 12, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pancreatitis-associated-with-genetic-risk-factors
18. Masson E, Le Marechal C, Delcenserie R, Chen JM, Ferec C. Hereditary pancreatitis caused by a double gain-of-function trypsinogen mutation. Human genetics. Jun 2008;123(5):521-9. doi:10.1007/s00439-008-0508-6
19. LaRusch J, Whitcomb DC. Genetics of pancreatitis. Current opinion in gastroenterology. Sep 2011;27(5):467-74. doi:10.1097/MOG.0b013e328349e2f8
20. Hasan A, Moscoso DI, Kastrinos F. The Role of Genetics in Pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. Oct 2018;28(4):587-603. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2018.06.001
21. Grendell JH. Genetic factors in pancreatitis. Current gastroenterology reports. Apr 2003;5(2):105-9. doi:10.1007/s11894-003-0078-7
22. Szmola R, Sahin-Toth M. Chymotrypsin C (caldecrin) promotes degradation of human cationic trypsin: identity with Rinderknecht's enzyme Y. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Jul 3 2007;104(27):11227-32. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703714104
23. Whitcomb DC. Mechanisms of disease: Advances in understanding the mechanisms leading to chronic pancreatitis. Nature clinical practice Gastroenterology & hepatology. Nov 2004;1(1):46-52. doi:10.1038/ncpgasthep0025
24. Witt H, Beer S, Rosendahl J, et al. Variants in CPA1 are strongly associated with early onset chronic pancreatitis. Nature genetics. Oct 2013;45(10):1216-20. doi:10.1038/ng.2730
25. Nijmeijer RM, van Santvoort HC, Zhernakova A, et al. Association analysis of genetic variants in the myosin IXB gene in acute pancreatitis. PloS one. 2013;8(12):e85870. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085870
26. Molven A, Njolstad PR, Weiss FU. Lipase gene fusion: a new route to chronic pancreatitis. Oncotarget. 2015;6(31):30443-4. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5454
27. Nelson A, Myers K. Shwachman-Diamond Syndrome. In: Adam M, Ardinger H, Pagon R, eds. GeneReviews(r). University of Washington, Seattle; 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1756/
28. Goldstein A, Falk M. Mitochondrial DNA Deletion Syndromes. In: Adam M, Ardinger H, Pagon R, eds. GeneReviews(r). University of Washington, WA; 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1203/
29. O'Neill M, Stumpf A, McKusick V. Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young, Type 8, With Exocrine Function; MODY8. Johns Hopkins University. Updated April 21, 2025. https://omim.org/entry/609812
30. Kniffin C, McKusick V. Johanson-Blizzard Syndrome; JBS. Johns Hopkins University. Updated February 24, 2025. https://omim.org/entry/243800
31. Lerch MM, Zenker M, Turi S, Mayerle J. Developmental and metabolic disorders of the pancreas. Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America. Jun 2006;35(2):219-41, vii. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2006.02.004
32. Durie PR. Inherited and congenital disorders of the exocrine pancreas. Gastroenterologist. Sep 1996;4(3):169-87.
33. Ooi CY, Gonska T, Durie PR, Freedman SD. Genetic testing in pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. Jun 2010;138(7):2202-6, 2206.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.022
34. Walker NF, Warren OJ, Gawn L, Jiao LR. The role of genetic testing in management of hereditary chronic pancreatitis. JRSM short reports. Jan 2013;4(1):6. doi:10.1258/shorts.2012.012071
35. Ballard DD, Flueckiger JR, Fogel EL, et al. Evaluating Adults With Idiopathic Pancreatitis for Genetic Predisposition: Higher Prevalence of Abnormal Results With Use of Complete Gene Sequencing. Pancreas. Jan 2015;44(1):116-21. doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000000225
36. Palermo JJ, Lin TK, Hornung L, et al. Genophenotypic Analysis of Pediatric Patients With Acute Recurrent and Chronic Pancreatitis. Pancreas. Oct 2016;45(9):1347-52. doi:10.1097/mpa.0000000000000655
37. Invitae. Invitae Chronic Pancreatitis Panel. https://www.invitae.com/us/providers/test-catalog/test-01745
38.  Ambry. Pancreatitis panel. https://www.ambrygen.com/clinician/genetic-testing/69/exome-and-general-genetics/pancreatitis-panel
39. LabCorp. Pancreatitis: Three-gene Profile (PRSS1, SPINK1, CFTR) (Full Gene Sequencing). https://www.labcorp.com/tests/252794/pancreatitis-three-gene-profile-i-prss1-spink1-cftr-i-full-gene-sequencing
40. ARUP. Pancreatitis Panel (CFTR, CTRC, PRSS1, SPINK1), Sequencing. https://ltd.aruplab.com/Tests/Pub/3004788
41. Poddar U, Yachha SK, Mathias A, Choudhuri G. Genetic predisposition and its impact on natural history of idiopathic acute and acute recurrent pancreatitis in children. Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. Aug 2015;47(8):709-14. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2015.04.012
42. Ceppa EP, Pitt HA, Hunter JL, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis: endoscopic and surgical management. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. May 2013;17(5):847-56; discussion 856-7. doi:10.1007/s11605-013-2167-8
43. Sultan M, Werlin S, Venkatasubramani N. Genetic prevalence and characteristics in children with recurrent pancreatitis. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. May 2012;54(5):645-50. doi:10.1097/mpg.0b013e31823f0269
44. Applebaum-Shapiro SE, Finch R, Pfutzer RH, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis in North America: the Pittsburgh-Midwest Multi-Center Pancreatic Study Group Study. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) [et al]. 2001;1(5):439-43. doi:10.1159/000055844
45. Kumar S, Ooi CY, Werlin S, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Pediatric Acute Recurrent and Chronic Pancreatitis: Lessons From INSPPIRE. JAMA pediatrics. Jun 1 2016;170(6):562-9. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4955
46. Grabarczyk AM, Oracz G, Wertheim-Tysarowska K, et al. Chymotrypsinogen C Genetic Variants, Including c.180TT, Are Strongly Associated With Chronic Pancreatitis in Pediatric Patients. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Dec 2017;65(6):652-657. doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001767
47. Schwarzenberg SJ, Bellin M, Husain SZ, et al. Pediatric chronic pancreatitis is associated with genetic risk factors and substantial disease burden. The Journal of pediatrics. Apr 2015;166(4):890-896.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.11.019
48. Zou WB, Tang XY, Zhou DZ, et al. SPINK1, PRSS1, CTRC, and CFTR Genotypes Influence Disease Onset and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Pancreatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. Nov 12 2018;9(11):204. doi:10.1038/s41424-018-0069-5
49. Nabi Z, Talukdar R, Venkata R, Aslam M, Shava U, Reddy DN. Genetic Evaluation of Children with Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. Oct 2020;65(10):3000-3005. doi:10.1007/s10620-019-06026-2
50. Suzuki M, Minowa K, Nakano S, Isayama H, Shimizu T. Genetic Abnormalities in Pancreatitis: An Update on Diagnosis, Clinical Features, and Treatment. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;11(1):31. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11010031
51. Weiss FU, Laemmerhirt F, Lerch MM. Next generation sequencing pitfalls in diagnosing trypsinogen (PRSS1) mutations in chronic pancreatitis. Gut. Sep 28 2020;doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322864
52. Zou WB, Wang YC, Ren XL, et al. TRPV6 variants confer susceptibility to chronic pancreatitis in the Chinese population. Hum Mutat. Aug 2020;41(8):1351-1357. doi:10.1002/humu.24032
53. Ellis I, Lerch MM, Whitcomb DC. Genetic testing for hereditary pancreatitis: guidelines for indications, counselling, consent and privacy issues. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) [et al]. 2001;1(5):405-15. 54. ASCO. Hereditary Pancreatitis. Updated February 5, 2024. https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/hereditary-pancreatitis
54. Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM, Giardiello FM, Hampel HL, Burt RW. ACG Clinical Guideline: Genetic Testing and Management of Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Syndromes. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG. 2015;110(2):223-262. doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.435
55. Gardner TB, Adler DG, Forsmark CE, Sauer BG, Taylor JR, Whitcomb DC. ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2020;115(3)doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535
56. Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG. 2024;119(3):419-437. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645
57. Lohr JM, Dominguez-Munoz E, Rosendahl J, et al. United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis (HaPanEU). United European gastroenterology journal. Mar 2017;5(2):153-199. doi:10.1177/2050640616684695
58. Parniczky A, Abu-El-Haija M, Husain S, et al. EPC/HPSG evidence-based guidelines for the management of pediatric pancreatitis. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) [et al]. Mar 2018;18(2):146-160. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2018.01.001
59. Gariepy CE, Heyman MB, Lowe ME, et al. Causal Evaluation of Acute Recurrent and Chronic Pancreatitis in Children: Consensus From the INSPPIRE Group. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Jan 2017;64(1):95-103. doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001446
60. NCCN. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Version 2.2025. Updated February 3, 2025. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf
61. NCCN. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, Pancreatic, and Prostate. Updated March 6, 2025. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bopp.pdf
62. Greenhalf W, Lévy P, Gress T, et al. International consensus guidelines on surveillance for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the
63. International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) [et al]. Jul 2020;20(5):910-918. doi:10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.011
64. NICE. Pancreatitis. Updated December 16, 2020. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng104/chapter/Recommendations

Coding Section

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive.

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies, and accredited national guidelines.

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved" 

History From 2014 Forward