Daily Hemodialysis and Hemodialysis in the Home Setting - CAM 050HB

Description
NOTE: Within this policy, the terms hemodialysis and dialysis are used interchangeably and always refer to hemodialysis.

Healthy kidneys filter about 200 quarts of fluid every 24 hours; about 2 quarts are removed from the body in the form of urine. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the complete, or nearly complete, failure of the kidneys to perform the function of filtering waste and excess fluid from the body at a level needed to sustain day-to-day life; this is usually when kidney function is less than 10 percent of normal. Kidney failure is usually a slow, progressive disease, often taking years to culminate in ESRD, at which stage renal replacement therapy is required in the form of dialysis or a kidney transplant. During hemodialysis, the blood is removed from the body via tubing and flows through an "artificial kidney" where it is filtered to remove waste and excess fluid. When dialysis is adequate, the symptoms and complications of renal failure lessen or can be managed.

Symptoms of kidney failure may include:

  • Abnormally dark or light skin and changes in nails.
  • Amenorrhea.
  • Bone pain.
  • Brain and nervous system symptoms.
  • Breath odor.
  • Drowsiness and confusion.
  • Easy bruising, nosebleeds or blood in the stool.
  • Edema.
  • Excessive thirst.
  • Frequent hiccups.
  • General ill feeling and fatigue.
  • Generalized itching (pruritus) and dry skin.
  • Headaches.
  • Loss of appetite.
  • Low level of sexual interest and impotence.
  • Muscle twitching or cramps.
  • Nausea.
  • Numbness in the hands, feet or other areas.
  • Problems concentrating or thinking.
  • Sleep problems, such as insomnia, restless leg syndrome or obstructive sleep apnea.
  • Vomiting, especially in the morning.
  • Weight loss without trying.

 Treatment for ESRD includes:

  • Dialysis or kidney transplant.
  • Extra calcium and vitamin D.
  • Medications to act as phosphate binders.
  • Treatment of anemia.
  • Low-protein diet that includes enough calories to prevent losing weight.
  • Limit fluids, salt, potassium, phosphorous and other electrolytes.

Complications of ESRD may include:

  • Anemia.
  • Bleeding from the stomach or intestines.
  • Bone, joint and muscle pain.
  • Brain dysfunction, confusion and dementia.
  • Changes in blood sugar (glucose).
  • Changes in electrolyte levels.
  • Congestive heart failure.
  • Coronary artery disease.
  • Damage to nerves of the legs and arms, peripheral neuropathy.
  • Fluid buildup around the lungs.
  • Heart and blood vessel complications.
  • Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, liver failure.
  • High blood pressure.
  • Hyperparathyroidism.
  • Increased risk of infections.
  • Malnutrition.
  • Pericarditis.
  • Phosphorous levels become too high.
  • Potassium levels become too high.
  • Seizures.
  • Skin dryness, itching/scratching, leading to skin infection.
  • Stroke.
  • Weakening of the bones, fractures, joint disorders.

Dialysis is usually carried out in a clinic setting. While dialysis can be performed at home, home dialysis is not suitable for everyone. Suitability for home dialysis depends on many factors, including the patient’s physical and mental abilities and medical condition; whether the patient has a dependable, suitable helper who can deal with emergencies; and whether the home environment has the space and facilities needed.

Most hemodialysis patients in the United States undergo dialysis three times a week for three to five hours at each session. Some patients may receive this intermittent dialysis in the home. Medicare payment for dialysis, referred to as the "composite rate," is premised on thrice-weekly intermittent hemodialysis.

There has been long-standing interest in exploring different schedules for hemodialysis to create a more physiologic approach to potentially improve the morbidity and mortality associated with intermittent hemodialysis. Daily hemodialysis, defined as dialysis six to seven days a week, has been investigated in two different schedules:

  • Nocturnal hemodialysis, in which the patient undergoes a long period of dialysis while asleep on a daily basis
  • Daily hemodialysis sessions of two hours each, such that the total dialysis time is similar to the conventional three-times-a-week schedule

While daily hemodialysis has been investigated in the clinical setting, both daily dialysis and nocturnal dialysis are more feasible in the home setting.

Recently, two dialysis devices have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance with the specific labeling for home use; the NxStage System One (NxStage Medical Inc), and the PhD System® (Aksys), which may create further interest in home daily dialysis. The FDA approval for both devices was based on data showing that hemodialysis delivered in the home setting was equivalent to that offered in the clinic setting, in terms of the amount of therapy and the incidence of adverse effects. Patients served as their own controls.

Policy
Home hemodialysis may be MEDICALLY NECESSARY up to three times per week in the home setting for patients who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and meet ALL of the following criteria:

  • Are stable during hemodialysis treatment.
  • Are free of complications and significant concomitant disease that would render home hemodialysis unsuitable or unsafe.
  • Have a stable, well-functioning vascular access (i.e., arteriovenous [AV] fistula or graft).
  • Have demonstrated a positive commitment to following the end-stage renal disease plan of care, including regularly attending hemodialysis and following prescribed diet, medication regimen, fluid restriction, etc.
  • Have the ability and motivation to learn and carry out the hemodialysis procedure, and the commitment to maintain the hemodialysis treatment regimen.
  • Have at least one caregiver (friend or family member) who has also made an informed decision and commitment to assist with the hemodialysis treatment, and who is capable of learning and carrying out the treatment process.
  • Have suitable space and facilities within the home in which to set up and perform the hemodialysis treatment.
  • Have access to support of health care professionals, through a hemodialysis facility, who can be contacted easily and will respond rapidly.
  • Up to five treatments per week are allowed, treatment greater than five times per week is considered INVESTIGATIONAL.

The NxStage System portable hemodialysis machine is an equally acceptable alternative to standard hemodialysis machines for home hemodialysis, although it has not been proven to be more effective than standard hemodialysis machines for use in the home.

Wearable hemodialysis machines are considered experimental and INVESTIGATIONAL because their effectiveness has not been established.

Daily hemodialysis is INVESTIGATIONAL in any setting.

Rationale
In 2001, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDKD) convened a task force to address the issue of daily hemodialysis. This task force reviewed the published data and noted that case series consistently reported that daily hemodialysis was associated with an improvement in nutritional parameters, normalization of serum phosphate (particularly with nocturnal hemodialysis) and improvement in blood pressure and hematocrit (with an associated decrease in transfusion requirements or erythropoietin dosages). The published data did not address the issue of mortality. The task force concluded that a randomized clinical trial was warranted to further explore the outcomes, and discussion focused on trial design. The task force also discussed the economic impact of daily hemodialysis and Medicare reimbursement, which is currently based on three-times-weekly dialysis.

A literature search of the MEDLINE database revealed considerable published literature on daily and nocturnal hemodialysis, frequently performed in the clinic and not the home setting. Published studies primarily include single institution case series with comparison of the outcomes of patients undergoing intermittent dialysis who have switched to daily dialysis; in addition, there has been one nonrandomized comparative study of patients receiving either daily or nocturnal dialysis compared to those receiving intermittent dialysis. A representative review of the more recent studies is presented below.

Williams and colleagues at the Mayo Clinic reported on the outcomes of 21 patients who were sequentially treated with intermittent and daily hemodialysis. Patients served as their own controls. The daily dialysis schedule was associated with improvements in blood pressure, urea kinetics and symptoms between and during dialysis sessions. The authors concluded that this small short-term study demonstrated the feasibility of daily hemodialysis. In a similarly designed study from an overlapping group of investigators, Ting and colleagues reported on the outcomes of 42 patients with end-stage renal disease with a mean of four significant comorbidities. After conversion to daily dialysis, there was an improvement in dialysis parameters, as measured by Kt/V, and a significant decrease in hospital days. In those remaining on daily hemodialysis for 12 months, there were significant improvements in quality of life compared to the preceding 12 months, a reduction in antihypertensive medications and a significant reduction in erythropoietin requirements.

The London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study was a prospective nonrandomized comparative study of home daily (n = 11) and home nocturnal hemodialysis (n = 12) with outcomes compared to matched controls receiving conventional hemodialysis. The following results were reported in a series of publications. (Daily and nocturnal hemodialysis are collectively known as quotidian hemodialysis.)

  • There were no differences between the groups in numbers of hospital days or ER visits.
  • Weekly urea clearance is improved in quotidian hemodialysis.
  • Quotidian hemodialysis was associated with an improvement in symptoms both during and between dialysis sessions, and all patients chose to remain on quotidian hemodialysis after switching from intermittent dialysis.
  • Quotidian hemodialysis was associated with improvement in nutritional parameters.
  • Because of the increased number of treatments, treatment supply costs for quotidian hemodialysis were twice that of the conventional groups; however, there were cost savings related to the reduction in direct nursing time, after training in home hemodialysis is completed.

Reports describe the need and plans for, and status of, randomized trials to compare clinical outcomes of daily hemodialysis to conventional dialysis. Reports continue to be published with data from uncontrolled studies. For example, Blagg compared mortality (survival) of 117 patients treated by short-daily hemodialysis in 2003 and compared mortality to data from the U.S. Renal Data System. While they report a 61 percent better survival in the daily dialysis group, the study design raises questions about comparability of the groups. Randomized trials are needed.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the NIDDKD are jointly sponsoring two clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of more frequent hemodialysis sessions compared with conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis. One of these trials compares daily in-center hemodialysis (six times per week) with conventional in-center hemodialysis (three times per week). The other compares nocturnal hemodialysis (six times per week in the home) with conventional in-center hemodialysis. CMS has agreed to pay for covered patient care-related expenses for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in these trials. The duration of the nocturnal hemodialysis trial will be 14 months after patient enrollment.

In summary, there is inadequate published data to permit scientific conclusions regarding daily home hemodialysis. Larger controlled studies are needed to demonstrate whether the intermediate outcomes noted (urea clearance, nutritional parameters) translate to clinically significant improvements in patient-oriented outcomes, such as morbidity and mortality. Quality of life measures are also important.

In 2002, the National Institute for Clinical Evidence (NICE) published Technology Appraisal Guidance No. 48, titled Guidance on Home Compared with Hospital Haemodialysis for Patients with End-Stage Renal Failure. This guidance states: "In general, patients suitable for home haemodialysis will be those who:

  • Have the ability and motivation to learn to carry out the process
  • Have the commitment to maintain treatment
  • Are stable on dialysis
  • Are free of complications and significant concomitant disease that would render home haemodialysis unsuitable or unsafe
  • Have good functioning vascular access
  • Have a carer who has (or carers who have) also made an informed decision to assist with the haemodialysis unless the individual is able to manage on his or her own
  • Have suitable space and facilities or an area that could be adapted within their home environment."

Several clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of more frequent hemodialysis compared with thrice-weekly dialysis are still underway, and results have not yet been published. Therefore, published data is still inadequate to permit scientific conclusions regarding daily home hemodialysis. 

References:

  1. NKF – Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) (2017). Prepared by National Kidney Foundation. Available at <https://www.kidney.org> (accessed January 6, 2023).
  2. infoKID – Chronic Kidney Disease – Stage 3b to 5 (Version 1, December 2013). Prepared by British Kidney Disease Association. Available at <http://www.infoKID.org.uk> (accessed January 6, 2023)
  3. Warady BA, Chadha V. Chronic kidney disease in children: the global perspective. Pediatr Nephrol. Dec 2007; 22(12):1999-2009. PMID 17310383
  4. Hemodialysis (January 2018). Available at <http://www.niddk.nih.gov> (accessed January 9, 2023).
  5. Williams AW, Chebrolu SB, Ing TS, et al. Early clinical, quality of life and biochemical changes of daily hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. Jan 2004; 43(1):90-102. PMID 14712432
  6. Ting GO, Kjellstrand C, Freitas T, et al. Long-term study of high-comorbidity ESRD patients converted from conventional to short daily hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. Nov 2003; 42(5):1020-1035. PMID 14582046
  7. Brunelli SM, Wilson SM, Ficociello LH, et al. A comparison of clinical parameters and outcomes over 1 year in home hemodialysis patients using 2008K@home or NxStage System One. ASAIO J. Mar-Apr 2016; 62(2):182-189 PMID 28892402
  8. Lindsay RM, Leitch R, Heidenheim AP, et al. The London Daily/Nocturnal Hemodialysis Study - study design, morbidity and mortality results. Am J Kidney Dis. Jul 2003; 42(1 suppl):5-12. PMID 12830437
  9. Suri R, Depner TA, Blake PG, et al. Adequacy of quotidian hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. Jul 2003; 42(1 suppl):42-48. PMID 12830443
  10. Heidenheim AP, Muirhead N, Moist L, et al. Patients’ quality of life on quotidian hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. Jul 2003; 42(1 suppl):36-41. PMID 12830442
  11. Spanner E, Suri R, Heidenheim AP, et al. The impact of quotidian hemodialysis on nutrition. Am J Kidney Dis. Jul 2003; 42(1 suppl):30-35. PMID 12830441
  12. Kroeker A, Clark WF, Heidenheim AP, et al. An operating cost comparison between conventional and home quotidian hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. Jul 2003; 42(1 suppl):49-55. PMID 12830444
  13. Suri RS, Garg AX, Chertow GM, et al. Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials: study design. Kidney Int. Feb 2007; 71(4):349-359. PMID 17164834
  14. Walsh M, Manns BJ, Klarenbach S, et al. The effects of nocturnal hemodialysis compared to conventional hemodialysis on change in left ventricular mass: rationale and study design of a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Nephrol. Feb 22 2006; 7:2. PMID 16504054
  15. Blagg CR, Kjellstrand CM, Ting GO, et al. Comparison of survival between short-daily hemodialysis and conventional hemodialysis using the standardized mortality ratio. Hemodial Int. Oct 2006; 10(4):371-374. PMID 17014514
  16. CMS – Frequent Hemodialysis Network Clinical Trials (Transmittal No. 145, March 11, 2005:1-12). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Available  at <http://new.cms.hhs.gov> (accessed January 9, 2023).
  17. Bergman A, Fenton SS, Richardson RM, et al. Reduction in cardiovascular related hospitalization with nocturnal home hemodialysis. Clin Nephrol. Jan 2008; 69(1):33-39. PMID 18218314
  18. Kjellstrand CM, Buoncristiani U, Ting G, et al. Short daily haemodialysis: survival in 415 patients treated for 1006 patient-years. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Oct 2008; 23(10):3283-3289. PMID 18458034
  19. Hall YN, Larive B, Painter P, et al. Effects of six versus three times per week hemodialysis on physical performance, health, and functioning: Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) randomized trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. May 2012; 7(5):782-794. PMID 22422538
  20. Rocco MV, Daugirdas JT, Greene T, et al. Long-term Effects of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis on Mortality: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) Nocturnal Trial. Am J Kidney Dis. Sep 2015; 66(3):459-468. PMID 25863828
  21. Tennankore KK, Na Y, Wald R, et al. Short daily-, nocturnal-, and conventional-home hemodialysis have similar patient and treatment survival. Kidney Int. Jan 2018; 93(1):188-194. PMID 28844317
  22. Weinhandl ED, Gilberston DT, Collins AJ. Mortality, hospitalization, and technique failure in daily home hemodialysis and matched peritoneal dialysis patients: a matched cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. Jan 2016; 67(1):98-110. PMID 26319755
  23. Nesrallah GE, Li L, Suri RS. Comparative effectiveness of home dialysis therapies: a matched cohort study. Can J Kidney, Health Dis. 2016; 3:19. PMID 27006781
  24. Hakim RM, Saha S. Dialysis frequency versus dialysis time, that is the question. Kidney Int. May 2014; 85(5):1024-1029. PMID 24336033
  25. Zoccali C, Dounousi E, Abd El Hafeez S, et al. Should we extend the application of more frequent dialysis schedules? A 'yes' and a hopeful 'no'. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Jan 2015; 30(1):29-32. PMID 25538160
  26. Glickman JD, Chan C. Choosing home hemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. In: UpToDate, Berns JS (Ed), UpToDate, Waltham, MA. Available at <http://www.uptodate.com> (accessed January 9, 2023).
  27. Rosner MH, Ronco C. Remote monitoring for the wearable artificial kidney. Contrib Nephrol. 2011; 171:243-247. PMID 21625119
  28. Wester M, Gerritsen KG, Boer WH, et al. The wearable artificial kidney: a promise for the future? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013; 157(52):A6965. PMID 24382046
  29. Davenport A, Ronco C, Gura V. From wearable ultrafiltration device to wearable artificial kidney. Contrib Nephrol. 2011; 171:237-242. PMID 21625118
  30. Salani M, Roy S, Fissell WH. Innovations in wearable and implantable artificial kidneys. Am J Kidney Dis. Nov 2018; 72(5):745-751. PMID 30146422
  31. van Gelder MK, Mihaila SM, Jansen J, et al. From portable dialysis to a bioengineered kidney. Expert Rev Med Dev. May 2018; 15(5):323-336. PMID 29633900
  32. Gura V, Rivara MB, Bieber S, et al. A wearable artificial kidney for patients with end-stage renal disease. JCI Insight. Jun 2 2016; 1(8). PMID 27398407
  33. ECRI Institute. Wearable Artificial Kidney for Kidney Dialysis. Plymouth Meeting (PA): ECRI Institute; 2017 April. 11 p. (Health Technology Forecast).
  34. NKF – KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. National Kidney Foundation. Am J Kidney Dis. Mar 2015; 66(5):884-930. PMID 26498416
  35. NICE – Renal replacement therapy and conservative management. National Institute for Clinical Excellence Guidance 107 (October 3, 2018). Available at <http://www.nice.org.uk> (accessed January 10, 2023).
  36. Ashby D., Borman N., Burton J., et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Haemodialysis (July 2019), U.K. Renal Association. Available at <http://www.renal.org> (accessed January 10, 2023).
  37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic kidney disease in the United States, 2021. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021.

Coding Section

Codes Description
90945 

DIALYSIS PROCEDURE OTHER THAN HEMODIALYSIS (E.G., PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, HEMOFILTRATION, OR OTHER CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPIES), WITH SINGLE EVALUATION BY A PHYSICIAN OR OTHER QUALIFIED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL 

90947

DIALYSIS PROCEDURE OTHER THAN HEMODIALYSIS (E.G., PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, HEMOFILTRATION, OR OTHER CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPIES) REQUIRING REPEATED EVALUATIONS BY A PHYSICIAN OR OTHER QUALIFIED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL, WITH OR WITH OUT SUBSTANTIAL REVISION OF DIALYSIS PRESCRIPTION

90963

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR HOME DIALYSIS PER FULL MONTH, FOR PATIENTS YOUNGER THAN 2 YEARS OF AGE TO INCLUDE MONITORING FOR THE ADEQUACY OF NUTRITION, ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND COUNSELING OF PARENTS

90964

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR HOME DIALYSIS PER FULL MONTH, FOR PATIENTS 2 – 11 YEARS OF AGE TO INCLUDE MONITORING FOR THE ADEQUACY OF NUTRITION, ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND COUNSELING OF PARENTS

90965

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR HOME DIALYSIS PER FULL MONTH, FOR PATIENTS 12 – 19 YEARS OF AGE TO INCLUDE MONITORING FOR THE ADEQUACY OF NUTRITION, ASSESSMENT OF GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, AND COUNSELING OF PARENTS

90966

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR HOME DIALYSIS PER FULL MONTH, FOR PATIENTS 20 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER

90967 

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR DIALYSIS LESS THAN A FULL MONTH OF SERVICE, PER DAY; FOR PATIENTS YOUNGER THAN 2 YEARS OF AGE

90968 

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR DIALYSIS LESS THAN A FULL MONTH OF SERVICE, PER DAY; FOR PATIENTS 2 – 11 YEARS OF AGE 

90969 

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR DIALYSIS LESS THAN A FULL MONTH OF SERVICE, PER DAY; FOR PATIENTS 12 – 19 YEARS OF AGE

90970

END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE (ESRD) RELATED SERVICES FOR DIALYSIS LESS THAN A FULL MONTH OF SERVICE, PER DAY; FOR PATIENTS 20 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER 

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive. 

This medical policy was developed through consideration of peer-reviewed medical literature generally recognized by the relevant medical community, U.S. FDA approval status, nationally accepted standards of medical practice and accepted standards of medical practice in this community, Blue Cross Blue Shield Association technology assessment program (TEC) and other nonaffiliated technology evaluation centers, reference to federal regulations, other plan medical policies and accredited national guidelines. 

"Current Procedural Terminology © American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved"  

History From 2024 Forward      

01/01/2024 NEW POLICY

Complementary Content
${loading}